<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anti Spam Filter &#187; computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anti-spam-filter.com/tag/computers%e2%80%99/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com</link>
	<description>We show you news about the best software for anti spamfiltering.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Compromise Virus Detect? Cker Google web? Kning p? ? Over 1m computers</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/compromise-virus-detect-cker-google-web-kning-p-over-1m-computers.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/compromise-virus-detect-cker-google-web-kning-p-over-1m-computers.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 08:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/compromise-virus-detect-cker-google-web-kning-p-over-1m-computers.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google warns 1m or more web-surfers have malware that their computers infected s? to cut the f? rs? ker Their&#8217;s? seekers? terv? committed while k? pa p? skr? stranger them in scareware IU&#8217;s fake? kerhetsprogram. KrebsonSecurity published h? R The 19 July 2011. Actually, Google, for the duration of a regular review of an STI [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google warns 1m or more web-surfers have malware that their computers infected s? to cut the f? rs? ker Their&#8217;s? seekers? terv? committed while k? pa p? skr? stranger them in scareware IU&#8217;s fake? kerhetsprogram. KrebsonSecurity published h? R The 19 July 2011. Actually, Google, for the duration of a regular review of an STI from one data center, s? G to extraordin? Ra traffic etc? Injured from computers Apparently that was contaminated with the virus. Stated Mensch Damian&#8217;s? Safety engineer? R fr? N Google, the malware seems to infiltrate computers, by fake antivirus software. Victims take down of? Gently as d? Refter S? Dan software&#8217;s? Safety using Windows error that h? Ny? Ver f? R snatch the Web&#8217;s? Sheet. The Telegraph published this, the 21 July 2011. . . . L? The rest of: Google Detect? Cker Virus Web compromising p? ? Over 1m computers l? Links</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/compromise-virus-detect-cker-google-web-kning-p-over-1m-computers.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F? Author Six h? CEOs that their Sunday Times journo Hacked Computers</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/f-author-six-h-ceos-that-their-sunday-times-journo-hacked-computers-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/f-author-six-h-ceos-that-their-sunday-times-journo-hacked-computers-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[their]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/f-author-six-h-ceos-that-their-sunday-times-journo-hacked-computers-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TV? big f? Author p? k? n contribute to blogs doubt that the Sunday Times of Rupert Murdoch, the hacked computers p? the viewers? NDA, with a Trojan h? st. ? Although it? Is no h? For hard evidence f? R the r? Dsla, but? Nd? ? R these Farha? Questions Intensify Some? Even more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV? big f? Author p? k? n contribute to blogs doubt that the Sunday Times of Rupert Murdoch, the hacked computers p? the viewers? NDA, with a Trojan h? st. ? Although it? Is no h? For hard evidence f? R the r? Dsla, but? Nd? ? R these Farha? Questions Intensify Some? Even more to the row? Growing scandal related to the hacking of News International. TheRegister published h? R The 12 July 2011. Develop h? Ndelsen, s? Safety researcher&#8217;s? Provides that Brooke Magnanti wrote in a blog of her time she tj? Nat fr? N prostitution N? Ry? Ljt with a book on publishing it under the pseudonym IN 2005 Belle de Jour, Turn out the book to the big show? beds. Moreover, the same day as the launch of her book, e-mail to her k? Tt apparently a Sunday Times report that the k? Antigone her. Magnanti l &#8216;sa message in Florida, however, she does not answer. Rather, she is one of her row? Antigone asked to g? This ra f? R that she could stop her whereabouts to know? Other fri? N. . . . L? The rest of: Six Sunday Times journo f? Author h? CEOs their PCs Hacked</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/f-author-six-h-ceos-that-their-sunday-times-journo-hacked-computers-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F? Author Six h? CEOs that their Sunday Times journo Hacked Computers</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/f-author-six-h-ceos-that-their-sunday-times-journo-hacked-computers.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/f-author-six-h-ceos-that-their-sunday-times-journo-hacked-computers.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[their]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/f-author-six-h-ceos-that-their-sunday-times-journo-hacked-computers.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TV? big f? Author p? k? n contribute to blogs doubt that the Sunday Times of Rupert Murdoch, the hacked computers p? the viewers? NDA, with a Trojan h? st. ? Although it? Is no h? For hard evidence f? R the r? Dsla, but? Nd? ? R these Farha? Questions Intensify Some? Even more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV? big f? Author p? k? n contribute to blogs doubt that the Sunday Times of Rupert Murdoch, the hacked computers p? the viewers? NDA, with a Trojan h? st. ? Although it? Is no h? For hard evidence f? R the r? Dsla, but? Nd? ? R these Farha? Questions Intensify Some? Even more to the row? Growing scandal related to the hacking of News International. TheRegister published h? R The 12 July 2011. Develop h? Ndelsen, s? Safety researcher&#8217;s? Provides that Brooke Magnanti wrote in a blog of her time she tj? Nat fr? N prostitution N? Ry? Ljt with a book on publishing it under the pseudonym IN 2005 Belle de Jour, Turn out the book to the big show? beds. Moreover, the same day as the launch of her book, e-mail to her k? Tt apparently a Sunday Times report that the k? Antigone her. Magnanti l &#8216;sa message in Florida, however, she does not answer. Rather, she is one of her row? Antigone asked to g? This ra f? R that she could stop her whereabouts to know? Other fri? N. . . . L? The rest of: Six Sunday Times journo f? Author h? CEOs their PCs Hacked</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/f-author-six-h-ceos-that-their-sunday-times-journo-hacked-computers.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Korea&#8217;s Witnesses malware attacks p? Computers Nonghyup</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/south-koreas-witnesses-malware-attacks-p-computers-nonghyup-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/south-koreas-witnesses-malware-attacks-p-computers-nonghyup-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 13:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonghyup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Witnesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/south-koreas-witnesses-malware-attacks-p-computers-nonghyup-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a process f? R investigations? No, the authorities found in South Korea (SK) to PC port? Til IBM workers hab? Useful resources nds f? Is to cause a (national cooperative Agr? K? Your Federation? N) Nonghyup PC n? NETWORK shock that has viewers? Nts fr? Mst f? R to utf? Ra business of public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a process f? R investigations? No, the authorities found in South Korea (SK) to PC port? Til IBM workers hab? Useful resources nds f? Is to cause a (national cooperative Agr? K? Your Federation? N) Nonghyup PC n? NETWORK shock that has viewers? Nts fr? Mst f? R to utf? Ra business of public relations? l? n f? r cooperative. ? Complainer, 2 May 2011, declared? that according to the National underrepresented? ttelsetj? nsten, 200 n? only port was found? the room? a virus in these s? to n? tverksutrustning can? to become zombies. The Chosunilbo published this 4 May 2011. State tj? Nstem? N together with specialists inform? Policy, shows h? Ndelsen c Nonghyup? Mo capacity cyberkrigf? Ring? Political advanced sharply in North Korea (NK). Apparently, n? R July 7, 2009, subject to the pirates computer scientist NK? a DDoS attack with 435 servers in 61 pa? f? rs? ker spread of a single type of virus. But n? R there in March 2011, was another DDoS attack was 746 servers that use? Nds within 70 Pa? M? Costs f? R installation, n of m? S of three different virus samples. Meanwhile, for the virus that viewers? Nds in the cyber-attack Nonghyup they usually g? R into a banking system f? R computer to delete your data, while erasing sp? Clean too? N is g? f? RBI? S.. . . L? The rest of Korea Witnesses computers malware attack Nonghyup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/south-koreas-witnesses-malware-attacks-p-computers-nonghyup-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Korea&#8217;s Witnesses malware attacks p? Computers Nonghyup</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/south-koreas-witnesses-malware-attacks-p-computers-nonghyup.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/south-koreas-witnesses-malware-attacks-p-computers-nonghyup.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 09:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonghyup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Witnesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/south-koreas-witnesses-malware-attacks-p-computers-nonghyup.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a process f? R investigations? No, the authorities found in South Korea (SK) to PC port? Til IBM workers hab? Useful resources nds f? Is to cause a (national cooperative Agr? K? Your Federation? N) Nonghyup PC n? NETWORK shock that has viewers? Nts fr? Mst f? R to utf? Ra business of public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a process f? R investigations? No, the authorities found in South Korea (SK) to PC port? Til IBM workers hab? Useful resources nds f? Is to cause a (national cooperative Agr? K? Your Federation? N) Nonghyup PC n? NETWORK shock that has viewers? Nts fr? Mst f? R to utf? Ra business of public relations? l? n f? r cooperative. ? Complainer, 2 May 2011, declared? that according to the National underrepresented? ttelsetj? nsten, 200 n? only port was found? the room? a virus in these s? to n? tverksutrustning can? to become zombies. The Chosunilbo published this 4 May 2011. State tj? Nstem? N together with specialists inform? Policy, shows h? Ndelsen c Nonghyup? Mo capacity cyberkrigf? Ring? Political advanced sharply in North Korea (NK). Apparently, n? R July 7, 2009, subject to the pirates computer scientist NK? a DDoS attack with 435 servers in 61 pa? f? rs? ker spread of a single type of virus. But n? R there in March 2011, was another DDoS attack was 746 servers that use? Nds within 70 Pa? M? Costs f? R installation, n of m? S of three different virus samples. Meanwhile, for the virus that viewers? Nds in the cyber-attack Nonghyup they usually g? R into a banking system f? R computer to delete your data, while erasing sp? Clean too? N is g? f? RBI? S.. . . L? The rest of Korea Witnesses computers malware attack Nonghyup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/south-koreas-witnesses-malware-attacks-p-computers-nonghyup.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The police? Rotten? F? R to f? take computers with Cyber-bullying</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-police-rotten-f-r-to-f-take-computers-with-cyber-bullying-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-police-rotten-f-r-to-f-take-computers-with-cyber-bullying-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberbullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rotten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-police-rotten-f-r-to-f-take-computers-with-cyber-bullying-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ins? N Garry Shewan, assistant? Border police chief? Want Greater Manchester, police? F? Is to be played? S, the power to seize equipment users? Nds f? R problem? Statement second in the L? Line with the BBC published on May 1, 2011th Apparently, however, can not be en? Rt? Simple f? R best? Mning? N [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ins? N Garry Shewan, assistant? Border police chief? Want Greater Manchester, police? F? Is to be played? S, the power to seize equipment users? Nds f? R problem? Statement second in the L? Line with the BBC published on May 1, 2011th Apparently, however, can not be en? Rt? Simple f? R best? Mning? N of devices that use? Nds f? R to utf? Ra bullying? Tico will no this l? Tt! L? Tt to IDENTIFY? Ll that the person has beg? Tt? crime in particular. And as the m? Nniskor user? Connects computer scientists,? Versit cyber? Ticos have been m? S ability to intercept private data of other p? Internet. S?, Professor Carsten Maple, University of Bedfordshire, d? R? He? R head f? R National Center for Research Cyber-stalking? No, the cyber-vigilantes? ? R Ticos not given investment returns? Ckligt with force f? R to seize computer crimes are different? l? tt to you personally? s stalking although IDENTIFY? ll to m? stalker&#8217;s? rskilt machine users? nds. EWeek. com interpretative rule? venness? this April 2, 2011. . . . L? The rest of the:? Police Rotten F? R to f? take computers with Cyber-bullying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-police-rotten-f-r-to-f-take-computers-with-cyber-bullying-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The police? Rotten? F? R to f? take computers with Cyber-bullying</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-police-rotten-f-r-to-f-take-computers-with-cyber-bullying.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-police-rotten-f-r-to-f-take-computers-with-cyber-bullying.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 08:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberbullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rotten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-police-rotten-f-r-to-f-take-computers-with-cyber-bullying.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ins? N Garry Shewan, assistant? Border police chief? Want Greater Manchester, police? F? Is to be played? S, the power to seize equipment users? Nds f? R problem? Statement second in the L? Line with the BBC published on May 1, 2011th Apparently, however, can not be en? Rt? Simple f? R best? Mning? N [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ins? N Garry Shewan, assistant? Border police chief? Want Greater Manchester, police? F? Is to be played? S, the power to seize equipment users? Nds f? R problem? Statement second in the L? Line with the BBC published on May 1, 2011th Apparently, however, can not be en? Rt? Simple f? R best? Mning? N of devices that use? Nds f? R to utf? Ra bullying? Tico will no this l? Tt! L? Tt to IDENTIFY? Ll that the person has beg? Tt? crime in particular. And as the m? Nniskor user? Connects computer scientists,? Versit cyber? Ticos have been m? S ability to intercept private data of other p? Internet. S?, Professor Carsten Maple, University of Bedfordshire, d? R? He? R head f? R National Center for Research Cyber-stalking? No, the cyber-vigilantes? ? R Ticos not given investment returns? Ckligt with force f? R to seize computer crimes are different? l? tt to you personally? s stalking although IDENTIFY? ll to m? stalker&#8217;s? rskilt machine users? nds. EWeek. com interpretative rule? venness? this April 2, 2011. . . . L? The rest of the:? Police Rotten F? R to f? take computers with Cyber-bullying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-police-rotten-f-r-to-f-take-computers-with-cyber-bullying.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Botnet Boonana&#8217;s? Executable allow the operation north of infected computers:? Symantec</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/botnet-boonanas-executable-allow-the-operation-north-of-infected-computers-symantec.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/botnet-boonanas-executable-allow-the-operation-north-of-infected-computers-symantec.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boonana's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/botnet-boonanas-executable-allow-the-operation-north-of-infected-computers-symantec.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers at Symantec&#8217;s? Kerhetsf? Companies have warned f? Is that a number&#8217;s? Significant safety concerns in the platform-independent Boonana Troy knows that everyone can get? location and then user? nda computer f? tubes with it. Above? R all, it was in October 2010 Boonana emergence? f? rf? inner g? depletion in the guise of malicious [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers at Symantec&#8217;s? Kerhetsf? Companies have warned f? Is that a number&#8217;s? Significant safety concerns in the platform-independent Boonana Troy knows that everyone can get? location and then user? nda computer f? tubes with it. Above? R all, it was in October 2010 Boonana emergence? f? rf? inner g? depletion in the guise of malicious Java applications, as utf? rdas? ? Best? Preferences of contamination? N of b? The Mac OS X and Windows. Conventionally, the consequences of Troy Twitter and Facebook in the social n? Tverkssajter. In addition, n? Is a computer? R? Boonana infected system becomes part of a botnet? T showing architecture peer-to-peer, because it holds? Ller the communication protocol? N hj? LpA that? Revive n? Degrees of the f? Rs? K to pc? Nga. S? Safety Scientists warn Symantec Harshita Nayyar, &#8216;even if the f? RV? `Status to Botn? Such protocols robust to some m? N, but the s? Executable in? L Dej? n? gon with r? tt knowledge of abuse f? fun of it? NY profits simply. Softpedia. com interpretative rule? venness? declaration? n Nayyar? r 17 January 2011. Description? N on? Last threat,&#8217;s? Gives Symantec researchers to f? COMPANY &#8220;that has been identified as Jnanabot. While Nayyar blogs anyway? S, the error in M? Can Minimum abused f? R sammanst? Dung of? Over information? N p? Contaminated equipment , while the iv? inner situation? N, can? subject to change user? nds f? r to redial? tta an active botnets? tk? r simult? same time, conv? Scattered g? is it about? jligt to f? control? ver one already? r &#8216;n&#8217; acquires. Symantec. com report? this January 18, 2011. In addition, SEG? N scientist can have an attack? show? ng on m? ldatorn? is identified, their information? N collected, fail in its active n? TTJ? nst exploitation, and k? r? to m?&#8217;s attacks. Meanwhile, another bevakningsf? companies ESET planned for 2011 that will be? m?&#8217;s cross-platform attacks that use? connects Java and other vectors? is independent of the operating system, one f? RUTS? gels? n that? Symantec sistn? mnda case appears to be unfounded. f? RUTS? gels? np?&#8217;s the same? tt one m?&#8217;s the ESET Symantec has given reason? n? is malicious software? is unlikely to cause a l? line pc? rre risk in 2011. I? Last male? gf? r datoranv? that each user&#8217;s staying? kert fr? n infection? No previous malevolent, has been asked to download antivirus and h&#8217;ll update it as well? and scan your PC for any f? prevalence of Boonana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/botnet-boonanas-executable-allow-the-operation-north-of-infected-computers-symantec.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuxnet infection N m S of 10,000 computers in India? Symantec</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/stuxnet-infection-n-m-s-of-10000-computers-in-india-symantec-4.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/stuxnet-infection-n-m-s-of-10000-computers-in-india-symantec-4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuxnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/stuxnet-infection-n-m-s-of-10000-computers-in-india-symantec-4.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to f? Tease gets&#8217;s on security-p? Symantec, the worm Stuxnet v? L designed, error free, will it take? NDOS vital industrial systems in India. The figures show the company&#8217;s A, malware, f? R now? R bothered? S of India&#8217;s 10 000 computers? Are installed in anl? PLANTS petroqu? Micas and several houses of food? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to f? Tease gets&#8217;s on security-p? Symantec, the worm Stuxnet v? L designed, error free, will it take? NDOS vital industrial systems in India. The figures show the company&#8217;s A, malware, f? R now? R bothered? S of India&#8217;s 10 000 computers? Are installed in anl? PLANTS petroqu? Micas and several houses of food? N. Commenting on this development, technology partner? For information? No risk f? R association? N, Devendra Parulekar p? Ernst &amp; Young? Plead? that the attack was very real. hostile neighbors India and was about future terrorist attacks? place through? s of Stuxnet to? adi?. Timesofindia. India Times. com report? This December 23, 2010. Said Vice President Shantanu Ghosh activities f? R Symantec products in India, inform Stuxnet a virus? Tico unprecedented infected units p? the actual row? WORLD vine? Where N is in about 100,000 computers? Over the entire row? WORLD. India was the third m? S tr? Inner webs f? Tubes f? FOLLOWS l? Commit? S Ir? Ne Indonesia, a? Adi?. Timesofindia. India Times. com report? the h? r. Garce? Another said? S to Stuxnet affected computers actually? Is connected to the servers in Denmark and Malaysia. Ins? N? L, but you can? Being ENF? Cally said hab? Of f? Pipes systems in India, the names p? they ask? for hard anl? PLANTS &#8220;can not be specified in view p? k? nslig fr? demand. St.? r, Kaspersky Labs vine? another security f? companies? n tr? djer? latest revelation? n Symantec India. Head f? rs? kerhetspolisen Specialist Alexander Gostev of Kaspersky Lab, which has published the book in October 2010 stated? that India was the pa? s to m? r infected with Stuxnet. The data showed that n? total number of computers infected with Stuxnet reason v? xande concern n.? ever since the f? station location? n Stuxnet in July 2010, n? total number f? roreningar? you India during the f? station five days they? verse Kreds 8500, while Indonesia was a bit l? ngre ? n 5000 S and Go? No, n? something more?&#8217;s 3000, the three PA? company m?&#8217;s Stuxnet-infected. However tough? Kaspersky No information was published in September 2010, India? a raging problem? vein d?, PA?&#8217;s top the list? over reports while m? sf? ljde with 8000 infections in Indonesia 3000, while the Go? n, s? nktes to 765th Adem?&#8217;s, the television? companies? devs? lligt that row? hide no to attack through?&#8217;s of Stuxnet f? Choosing? that? ka in 2011. f? Travel lock? rs? led India&#8217;s industrial units vine?? n entire row? WORLD f? r be Implemented? dure website? No adequate protection f? r to stay protected against sophisticated viruses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/stuxnet-infection-n-m-s-of-10000-computers-in-india-symantec-4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuxnet infection N m S of 10,000 computers in India? Symantec</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/stuxnet-infection-n-m-s-of-10000-computers-in-india-symantec-3.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/stuxnet-infection-n-m-s-of-10000-computers-in-india-symantec-3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuxnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/stuxnet-infection-n-m-s-of-10000-computers-in-india-symantec-3.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to f? Tease gets&#8217;s on security-p? Symantec, the worm Stuxnet v? L designed, error free, will it take? NDOS vital industrial systems in India. The figures show the company&#8217;s A, malware, f? R now? R bothered? S of India&#8217;s 10 000 computers? Are installed in anl? PLANTS petroqu? Micas and several houses of food? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to f? Tease gets&#8217;s on security-p? Symantec, the worm Stuxnet v? L designed, error free, will it take? NDOS vital industrial systems in India. The figures show the company&#8217;s A, malware, f? R now? R bothered? S of India&#8217;s 10 000 computers? Are installed in anl? PLANTS petroqu? Micas and several houses of food? N. Commenting on this development, technology partner? For information? No risk f? R association? N, Devendra Parulekar p? Ernst &amp; Young? Plead? that the attack was very real. hostile neighbors India and was about future terrorist attacks? place through? s of Stuxnet to? adi?. Timesofindia. India Times. com report? This December 23, 2010. Said Vice President Shantanu Ghosh activities f? R Symantec products in India, inform Stuxnet a virus? Tico unprecedented infected units p? the actual row? WORLD vine? Where N is in about 100,000 computers? Over the entire row? WORLD. India was the third m? S tr? Inner webs f? Tubes f? FOLLOWS l? Commit? S Ir? Ne Indonesia, a? Adi?. Timesofindia. India Times. com report? the h? r. Garce? Another said? S to Stuxnet affected computers actually? Is connected to the servers in Denmark and Malaysia. Ins? N? L, but you can? Being ENF? Cally said hab? Of f? Pipes systems in India, the names p? they ask? for hard anl? PLANTS &#8220;can not be specified in view p? k? nslig fr? demand. St.? r, Kaspersky Labs vine? another security f? companies? n tr? djer? latest revelation? n Symantec India. Head f? rs? kerhetspolisen Specialist Alexander Gostev of Kaspersky Lab, which has published the book in October 2010 stated? that India was the pa? s to m? r infected with Stuxnet. The data showed that n? total number of computers infected with Stuxnet reason v? xande concern n.? ever since the f? station location? n Stuxnet in July 2010, n? total number f? roreningar? you India during the f? station five days they? verse Kreds 8500, while Indonesia was a bit l? ngre ? n 5000 S and Go? No, n? something more?&#8217;s 3000, the three PA? company m?&#8217;s Stuxnet-infected. However tough? Kaspersky No information was published in September 2010, India? a raging problem? vein d?, PA?&#8217;s top the list? over reports while m? sf? ljde with 8000 infections in Indonesia 3000, while the Go? n, s? nktes to 765th Adem?&#8217;s, the television? companies? devs? lligt that row? hide no to attack through?&#8217;s of Stuxnet f? Choosing? that? ka in 2011. f? Travel lock? rs? led India&#8217;s industrial units vine?? n entire row? WORLD f? r be Implemented? dure website? No adequate protection f? r to stay protected against sophisticated viruses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/stuxnet-infection-n-m-s-of-10000-computers-in-india-symantec-3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

