<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anti Spam Filter &#187; Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anti-spam-filter.com/tag/spam/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com</link>
	<description>We show you news about the best software for anti spamfiltering.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:56:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>UK to N? 4 pc? Dung? N AR? Ses m? S spam</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/uk-to-n-4-pc-dung-n-ar-ses-m-s-spam.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/uk-to-n-4-pc-dung-n-ar-ses-m-s-spam.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/uk-to-n-4-pc-dung-n-ar-ses-m-s-spam.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


According s?&#8217;s Safety? Seller Symantec, which ALLM? They do not happen? State? STIC m? The latest cyber-criminals? est Ticos? n f? control? over the n? only? ka contaminated equipment in the F? purified Kingdom f? return r fr? n enormous m? ngder skr? p email destructive. The report states that during August 2010? S occupies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1381422714371332";
/* 468x60, oprettet 02-04-10 */
google_ad_slot = "2793385416";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p><p>According s?&#8217;s Safety? Seller Symantec, which ALLM? They do not happen? State? STIC m? The latest cyber-criminals? est Ticos? n f? control? over the n? only? ka contaminated equipment in the F? purified Kingdom f? return r fr? n enormous m? ngder skr? p email destructive. The report states that during August 2010? S occupies n? Only four of the generation? N of n? Mere meters? H? Gst skr? Ppost in v? Rlden. In addition, there has been one hundred percent manu? Xt of the total skr? Ppost fr? N n huge? Tverk of compromised systems h? R?. F? Ljaktligen U. K n? Currently, est? ? Verf? Ra 4th 5% of v? Rlden skr? Ppost including the top ten? Spammers l? Connecting v? Rlden behind? S U.S., India and Brazil. Other pa? L? Commits the same? Kningstakten in F? Purified Kingdom, France, Italy and Germany, suggesting p? that of the ten m? S prol? FICOSA spam generating nations, four in V? Steuropa. It? R orov? Ckande that, although spammers have been handling infected computers in a small percentage who have succeeded? Ka, the total volume of e Electr? Cal Trash. This means? R, for a period, but? Over 24 hours? R spam generated by 6% m? S? N n? Gon previous m? Month. In addition, it was found that botnets m? S important to Rustock est? N uses an n? Simply unparalleled f? R PCs, v? Rlden consumers seriously. Globally? Botnet activity fell much more? S j? Mf? Directors? N with n? Per gon? Odo before, corresponding to n? Town all their env? Or skr? Ppost. Indeed? R that 95% of all e Electr? Incoming calls to Use? User? R spam, suggesting p? significant producers? xt p? 84% in April 2010. Reviewed by Paul Wood, senior analyst p? Symantec to? Although it was clear that Britain h? Ll p? be an AR? A very f? Redras of spam, no hab? The n? Gon raz? Ns? Lida on why.There spammers m? Ste v? LJA Law fri? N Britain f? R building s? Tverk fr? N spambots and release? Ra breeds. Store Security published this p? news. Mr. Tr? ? R? F? R to? Adem? S f to consumers? Rmodligen U. K not know? Do the usual risks and t? Nkte their ink? P in l? Line? R&#8217;s? Securely, without having the infection? N f? R threat on board. Adem? S m? Nga m? Nniskor no? Real programs that can be occupied? Pocket any infection? N p? their computers, which guarantee&#8217;s? safety? small? ADI?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/uk-to-n-4-pc-dung-n-ar-ses-m-s-spam.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pumps Rustock Botnet N? Only m? Max Spam</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-rustock-botnet-n-only-m-max-spam-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-rustock-botnet-n-only-m-max-spam-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rustock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-rustock-botnet-n-only-m-max-spam-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


On August 24, 2010, sl? Pptes Symantec&#8217;s August 2010 MessageLabs Intelligence Report. The report was? Wing to spam e-mail sent fr? N n botnets? 95% of all e-mails? Nico (late July 2010) by 84% in April 2010. The report states that Rustock sigui? to be l? der of botnet spam-env? or 41% in August 2010 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 24, 2010, sl? Pptes Symantec&#8217;s August 2010 MessageLabs Intelligence Report. The report was? Wing to spam e-mail sent fr? N n botnets? 95% of all e-mails? Nico (late July 2010) by 84% in April 2010. The report states that Rustock sigui? to be l? der of botnet spam-env? or 41% in August 2010 fr? n 32% in April 2010, but reductions? n p? n? Number Botn? T under their control to one. 3 million in August 2010, 2. 5 million in April (2010). Paul Wood, senior analyst p? MessageLabs Intelligence? R? Want? the total volume of skr? ppost in circulation? n cay? bit in previous quarters, f? r most? check Botn? t p? gun n da? Number of robots, tough? n messagelab News on 24 August 2010. Tr? a? Adi? be an exception? n was Rustock reduce n? Number Botn? T, but the student? its volume &#8211; n? die f? rdubblades? m? ngden skr? ppost sent fr? n each bot every minute leading to a 6%? increase in the spam emails every day? a. In addition, the botnet stopped Use? nda TLS encryption f? to send the spam, as faster connections. N? Are you stocked? Nger TLS encryption, botnets can send massive volume? Volumes of spam in this case, to the tune of 192 skr? Ppostmeddelanden per minute ist? Mews f? R 96th Adem? S Rustock, the Cutwail Grum and Botn? Tverk? R responsible f? R 6th 99% and 16. 36% of total spam, respectively. The report states that resume? Pocket? f? r f? inner g? either 2007 Cutwail ENV? p? n? only m? h? gst malware? nn? something else n? tverk of bots, usually in the form of a ZIP attachment. The researchers said the f? Rh? Llandet? No spam in v? Rlden and b? Pc nico was 92nd 2% (one of the first 08 post). About 18% of spam you see? A botnet? N? Aa-be-classified. n? tfiske activity? reservoirs? 0th 1% to 1 363rd An e-mail. Wood said the room? An experienced significant f? Rb? Ttring the activity of the usual discredited? Nkta botnet. In several cases? Being m? A recent incarnations of existing botnets and has been updated as well?? N Botn? T brand new b? Posts start to appear, tough? N messagelab reports it 24 August 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-rustock-botnet-n-only-m-max-spam-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pumps Rustock Botnet N? Only m? Max Spam</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-rustock-botnet-n-only-m-max-spam.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-rustock-botnet-n-only-m-max-spam.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rustock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-rustock-botnet-n-only-m-max-spam.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 24, 2010, sl? Pptes Symantec&#8217;s August 2010 MessageLabs Intelligence Report. The report was? Wing to spam e-mail sent fr? N n botnets? 95% of all e-mails? Nico (late July 2010) by 84% in April 2010. The report states that Rustock sigui? to be l? der of botnet spam-env? or 41% in August 2010 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 24, 2010, sl? Pptes Symantec&#8217;s August 2010 MessageLabs Intelligence Report. The report was? Wing to spam e-mail sent fr? N n botnets? 95% of all e-mails? Nico (late July 2010) by 84% in April 2010. The report states that Rustock sigui? to be l? der of botnet spam-env? or 41% in August 2010 fr? n 32% in April 2010, but reductions? n p? n? Number Botn? T under their control to one. 3 million in August 2010, 2. 5 million in April (2010). Paul Wood, senior analyst p? MessageLabs Intelligence? R? Want? the total volume of skr? ppost in circulation? n cay? bit in previous quarters, f? r most? check Botn? t p? gun n da? Number of robots, tough? n messagelab News on 24 August 2010. Tr? a? Adi? be an exception? n was Rustock reduce n? Number Botn? T, but the student? its volume &#8211; n? die f? rdubblades? m? ngden skr? ppost sent fr? n each bot every minute leading to a 6%? increase in the spam emails every day? a. In addition, the botnet stopped Use? nda TLS encryption f? to send the spam, as faster connections. N? Are you stocked? Nger TLS encryption, botnets can send massive volume? Volumes of spam in this case, to the tune of 192 skr? Ppostmeddelanden per minute ist? Mews f? R 96th Adem? S Rustock, the Cutwail Grum and Botn? Tverk? R responsible f? R 6th 99% and 16. 36% of total spam, respectively. The report states that resume? Pocket? f? r f? inner g? either 2007 Cutwail ENV? p? n? only m? h? gst malware? nn? something else n? tverk of bots, usually in the form of a ZIP attachment. The researchers said the f? Rh? Llandet? No spam in v? Rlden and b? Pc nico was 92nd 2% (one of the first 08 post). About 18% of spam you see? A botnet? N? Aa-be-classified. n? tfiske activity? reservoirs? 0th 1% to 1 363rd An e-mail. Wood said the room? An experienced significant f? Rb? Ttring the activity of the usual discredited? Nkta botnet. In several cases? Being m? A recent incarnations of existing botnets and has been updated as well?? N Botn? T brand new b? Posts start to appear, tough? N messagelab reports it 24 August 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-rustock-botnet-n-only-m-max-spam.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pumps Max Rustock Botnet Spam</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-max-rustock-botnet-spam-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-max-rustock-botnet-spam-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rustock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-max-rustock-botnet-spam-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 24, 2010, Symantec released its August 2010 MessageLabs Intelligence Report. The report says that spam e-mail sent from botnets reached 95% of all e-mail (at the end of July 2010) by 84% in April 2010. The report states that Rustock been the leader in spam-sending botnet, 41% in August 2010 from 32% in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 24, 2010, Symantec released its August 2010 MessageLabs Intelligence Report. The report says that spam e-mail sent from botnets reached 95% of all e-mail (at the end of July 2010) by 84% in April 2010. The report states that Rustock been the leader in spam-sending botnet, 41% in August 2010 from 32% in April 2010, but the reduction in the number of botnets under their control to one. 3 million in August 2010, 2. 5 million in April (2010). Paul Wood, senior analyst at MessageLabs Intelligence, said the total amount of spam in circulation decreased slightly compared with the previous quarter, most botnets witness the decline in the number of robots, according to news messagelab 24 August 2010. Wood added that an exemption was Rustock reduce the number of botnets, but the volume increased &#8211; almost doubled the amount of spam sent from each bot every minute leading to a 6% increase of spam every day. In addition, the botnet stopped using TLS encryption for sending spam, as faster connections. When you turn off TLS encryption, botnets can send large amounts of spam in this case, a total of 192 spam messages per minute instead of the 96th Rustock addition Cutwail Grum and botnets are responsible for the sixth 99% and 16. 36% of total spam, respectively. The report states that the first discovered in 2007, sending Cutwail the maximum number of malicious programs than any other network of bots, usually in the form of a ZIP attachment. The researchers said that the global share of spam e-mail was 92nd 2% (one of the first 08 post). About 18% of spam comes from botnets yet-to-be-classified. Phishing activity increased from 0. 1% to 1 363rd An e-mail. Wood said they had experienced a marked improvement in the activity of the usual suspects botnet. In several cases it may be more recent incarnations of existing botnets have been updated and new botnets also marks start to appear, according to reports messagelab August 24, 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-max-rustock-botnet-spam-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pumps Max Rustock Botnet Spam</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-max-rustock-botnet-spam.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-max-rustock-botnet-spam.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rustock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-max-rustock-botnet-spam.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 24, 2010, Symantec released its August 2010 MessageLabs Intelligence Report. The report says that spam e-mail sent from botnets reached 95% of all e-mail (at the end of July 2010) by 84% in April 2010. The report states that Rustock been the leader in spam-sending botnet, 41% in August 2010 from 32% in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 24, 2010, Symantec released its August 2010 MessageLabs Intelligence Report. The report says that spam e-mail sent from botnets reached 95% of all e-mail (at the end of July 2010) by 84% in April 2010. The report states that Rustock been the leader in spam-sending botnet, 41% in August 2010 from 32% in April 2010, but the reduction in the number of botnets under their control to one. 3 million in August 2010, 2. 5 million in April (2010). Paul Wood, senior analyst at MessageLabs Intelligence, said the total amount of spam in circulation decreased slightly compared with the previous quarter, most botnets witness the decline in the number of robots, according to news messagelab 24 August 2010. Wood added that an exemption was Rustock reduce the number of botnets, but the volume increased &#8211; almost doubled the amount of spam sent from each bot every minute leading to a 6% increase of spam every day. In addition, the botnet stopped using TLS encryption for sending spam, as faster connections. When you turn off TLS encryption, botnets can send large amounts of spam in this case, a total of 192 spam messages per minute instead of the 96th Rustock addition Cutwail Grum and botnets are responsible for the sixth 99% and 16. 36% of total spam, respectively. The report states that the first discovered in 2007, sending Cutwail the maximum number of malicious programs than any other network of bots, usually in the form of a ZIP attachment. The researchers said that the global share of spam e-mail was 92nd 2% (one of the first 08 post). About 18% of spam comes from botnets yet-to-be-classified. Phishing activity increased from 0. 1% to 1 363rd An e-mail. Wood said they had experienced a marked improvement in the activity of the usual suspects botnet. In several cases it may be more recent incarnations of existing botnets have been updated and new botnets also marks start to appear, according to reports messagelab August 24, 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/pumps-max-rustock-botnet-spam.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The amount of spam has increased by 10% between May and July</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-4.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 01:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[between]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-4.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest report by email security in August 2010 issued by a security specialist at the German entry &#8220;one time&#8221; that having been constant for the first part of the year (2010), the amount of spam has increased by 10% From May 2010 to July 2010th With a share of 96th 4% of the total [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest report by email security in August 2010 issued by a security specialist at the German entry &#8220;one time&#8221; that having been constant for the first part of the year (2010), the amount of spam has increased by 10% From May 2010 to July 2010th With a share of 96th 4% of the total volume of mail, spam is at record levels. Spammers leaders in July 2010 were the U.S., followed by Brazil and India. Germany dropped to seventh place. The company says that for the first time in June 2010, teams consisting of eleven found spam that uses a new trick to avoid spam filters. For example, when the recipient clicks on the attached file in HTML format via email, set up a JavaScript that redirects the user to the malicious page and open it in your browser. The latest report also notes that drug companies e-mail still rules, especially those that promote drugs for erectile dysfunction. These e-mail accounted for the largest share of pharmaceutical spam in July 2010 to 73rd 1%. Casino of spam, which disappeared in the spring of 2010, after the closure of many botnets, once again resurface. In July 2010 increase in spam advertising casino solution 16th 2% in July. 2%% in June 2010 and May 3, 2010 only. spam campaigns to copy watches remain in third place with 5%. In the case of malware, malware, the number of emails to rise. With only represented 0th 1% of total email volume in May 2010, rose to 0. 4% in July 2010. Most of this increase can be traced back to the Trojan Sasfis, which circulate mainly through e-mail disguised as messages from the courier and parcel services. The new report says Sasfis variants contributed 71st 8% of all malware in July 2010. In addition to spam and malware, the report of the last eleven highlights phishing. Phishing attacks are increasingly focused on online payment service, PayPal to be the main target. In June 2010, 96th 1% of phishing emails identified by eleven PayPal related. July (2010) witnessed the extra mail that tried to push credit cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The amount of spam has increased by 10% between May and July</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-3.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[between]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-3.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest report by email security in August 2010 issued by a security specialist at the German entry &#8220;one time&#8221; that having been constant for the first part of the year (2010), the amount of spam has increased by 10% From May 2010 to July 2010th With a share of 96th 4% of the total [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest report by email security in August 2010 issued by a security specialist at the German entry &#8220;one time&#8221; that having been constant for the first part of the year (2010), the amount of spam has increased by 10% From May 2010 to July 2010th With a share of 96th 4% of the total volume of mail, spam is at record levels. Spammers leaders in July 2010 were the U.S., followed by Brazil and India. Germany dropped to seventh place. The company says that for the first time in June 2010, teams consisting of eleven found spam that uses a new trick to avoid spam filters. For example, when the recipient clicks on the attached file in HTML format for e-mail, start a JavaScript that redirects the user to the malicious page and open it in your browser. The latest report also notes that drug companies e-mail still rules, especially those that promote drugs for erectile dysfunction. These e-mail accounted for the largest share of pharmaceutical spam in July 2010 to 73rd 1%. Casino of spam, which disappeared in the spring of 2010, after the closure of many botnets, once again resurface. In July 2010 increase in spam advertising casino solution 16th 2% in July. 2%% in June 2010 and May 3, 2010 only. spam campaigns to copy watches remain in third place with 5%. In the case of malware, malware, the number of emails to rise. With only represented 0th 1% of total email volume in May 2010, rose to 0. 4% in July 2010. Most of this increase can be traced back to the Trojan Sasfis, which circulate mainly through e-mail disguised as messages from the courier and parcel services. The new report says Sasfis variants contributed 71st 8% of all malware in July 2010. In addition to spam and malware, the report of the last eleven highlights phishing. Phishing attacks are increasingly focused on online payment service, PayPal to be the main target. In June 2010, 96th 1% of phishing emails identified by eleven PayPal related. July (2010) witnessed the extra mail that tried to push credit cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The amount of spam has increased by 10% between May and July</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[between]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest report by email security in August 2010 issued by a security specialist at the German entry &#8220;one time&#8221; that having been constant for the first part of the year (2010), the amount of spam has increased by 10% From May 2010 to July 2010th With a share of 96th 4% of the total [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest report by email security in August 2010 issued by a security specialist at the German entry &#8220;one time&#8221; that having been constant for the first part of the year (2010), the amount of spam has increased by 10% From May 2010 to July 2010th With a share of 96th 4% of the total volume of mail, spam is at record levels. Spammers leaders in July 2010 were the U.S., followed by Brazil and India. Germany dropped to seventh place. The company says that for the first time in June 2010, teams consisting of eleven found spam that uses a new trick to avoid spam filters. For example, when the recipient clicks on the attached file in HTML format for e-mail, start a JavaScript that redirects the user to the malicious page and open it in your browser. The latest report also notes that drug companies e-mail still rules, especially those that promote drugs for erectile dysfunction. These e-mail accounted for the largest share of pharmaceutical spam in July 2010 to 73rd 1%. Casino of spam, which disappeared in the spring of 2010, after the closure of many botnets, once again resurface. In July 2010 increase in spam advertising casino solution 16th 2% in July. 2%% in June 2010 and May 3, 2010 only. spam campaigns to copy watches remain in third place with 5%. In the case of malware, malware, the number of emails to rise. With only represented 0th 1% of total email volume in May 2010, rose to 0. 4% in July 2010. Most of this increase can be traced back to the Trojan Sasfis, which circulate mainly through e-mail disguised as messages from the courier and parcel services. The new report says Sasfis variants contributed 71st 8% of all malware in July 2010. In addition to spam and malware, the report of the last eleven highlights phishing. Phishing attacks are increasingly focused on online payment service, PayPal to be the main target. In June 2010, 96th 1% of phishing emails identified by eleven PayPal related. July (2010) witnessed the extra mail that tried to push credit cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The amount of spam has increased by 10% between May and July</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[between]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest report by email security in August 2010 issued by a security specialist at the German entry &#8220;one time&#8221; that having been constant for the first part of the year (2010), the amount of spam has increased by 10% From May 2010 to July 2010th With a share of 96th 4% of the total [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest report by email security in August 2010 issued by a security specialist at the German entry &#8220;one time&#8221; that having been constant for the first part of the year (2010), the amount of spam has increased by 10% From May 2010 to July 2010th With a share of 96th 4% of the total volume of mail, spam is at record levels. Spammers leaders in July 2010 were the U.S., followed by Brazil and India. Germany dropped to seventh place. The company says that for the first time in June 2010, teams consisting of eleven found spam that uses a new trick to avoid spam filters. For example, when the recipient clicks on the attached file in HTML format for e-mail, start a JavaScript that redirects the user to the malicious page and open it in your browser. The latest report also notes that drug companies e-mail still rules, especially those that promote drugs for erectile dysfunction. These e-mail accounted for the largest share of pharmaceutical spam in July 2010 to 73rd 1%. Casino of spam, which disappeared in the spring of 2010, after the closure of many botnets, once again resurface. In July 2010 increase in spam advertising casino solution 16th 2% in July. 2%% in June 2010 and May 3, 2010 only. spam campaigns to copy watches remain in third place with 5%. In the case of malware, malware, the number of emails to rise. With only represented 0th 1% of total email volume in May 2010, rose to 0. 4% in July 2010. Most of this increase can be traced back to the Trojan Sasfis, which circulate mainly through e-mail disguised as messages from the courier and parcel services. The new report says Sasfis variants contributed 71st 8% of all malware in July 2010. In addition to spam and malware, the report of the last eleven highlights phishing. Phishing attacks are increasingly focused on online payment service, PayPal to be the main target. In June 2010, 96th 1% of phishing emails identified by eleven PayPal related. July (2010) witnessed the extra mail that tried to push credit cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/the-amount-of-spam-has-increased-by-10-between-may-and-july.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MX Systems Laboratory YouSendIt Capture Spam</title>
		<link>http://anti-spam-filter.com/mx-systems-laboratory-yousendit-capture-spam-4.html</link>
		<comments>http://anti-spam-filter.com/mx-systems-laboratory-yousendit-capture-spam-4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouSendIt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anti-spam-filter.com/mx-systems-laboratory-yousendit-capture-spam-4.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security researchers in the Belgian company email security MX lab report that cyber-criminals run two spam fraud using popular website called &#8220;YouSendIt&#8221; a specialist on the exchange of files and their distribution over the Internet. The researchers note that one of the scam e-mail is spam with the subject line &#8220;You have received a file [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security researchers in the Belgian company email security MX lab report that cyber-criminals run two spam fraud using popular website called &#8220;YouSendIt&#8221; a specialist on the exchange of files and their distribution over the Internet. The researchers note that one of the scam e-mail is spam with the subject line &#8220;You have received a file from aleppotz rockypointinc @. Com through YouSendIt.&#8221; Moreover, it seems to identify the sender of the e-mail different depending on which name has been spoofed. It also proposes the body ie evidently an MP4 file with audio-format e-mail that readers can download from YouSendIt. But Internet links do not take users to the site instead of YouSendIt hxxp: / / carlaustiniii. org / x. html. Also according to the researchers, if you click on the URLs in a Mac computer so you can get a message saying &#8220;Wait four seconds &#8230;.&#8221; Experts believe that these spam messages that contain malicious code that may contaminate the user&#8217;s computer. Thereafter, the user is forwarded to a Canadian pharmacy website hxxp: / / spruce team. com /. At the same time, according to scam other e-mail recipients are told they have to run a malicious file on a file attachment. The name of this gadget YouSendIt_reader. zip. When unzipped, a file named YouSendIt_reader. exe so large as 20KB are available. Embedded a trojan virus attached to this Annex also be given different names in different security firm F-Secure, BitDefender, GData and called Gene Variant. Bredo. 2, while Microsoft calls Troy VideoDownloader: Win32/Waledac. C, say researchers from MX security laboratory. Softpedia. com reported this week in the 1 August 2010. Worryingly, according to MX Lab, its security researchers found that the combined strategies will increase as we have seen in recent months. In these strategies, e-mail takes users to a site containing malware and exploits. Thereafter, the user is sent to my expectation of a spam site that would realize a trojan infection on your computer. It is important to note that spammers spam campaigns mentioned two have used this strategy. But surely not be compromised, researchers have suggested that users continue to be very careful with all the files and links, says he got an email no matter how reliable it may seem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://anti-spam-filter.com/mx-systems-laboratory-yousendit-capture-spam-4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
