Twitter vs Email: Syndication struggle century
Twitter, no doubt, (the real word, I checked), has become the most talked-about social networks on the planet.
Twitter is growing by the second and nearly doubling in size every week. . . but you have the courage to defeat e-mail?
The message has been the most popular form of content syndication for the past 15 years. . .
Many have tried to conquer it, but also the RSS feeds are not obsolete by e-mail has proven to be the best form of electronic media and plan to stick to that title for many years. . .
Since Twitter has stepped onto the stage, many internet marketers realize how powerful it really is and began to use with, at times, however, e-mail.
From instant messaging community is engaged in social media, and many experts say that email marketing is dead. . .
. . . but is it?
I did some research to compare with Twitter via e-mail to find out which one to use more, which is the most effective and also how to combine the two for your online business to the next level.
VS-mail Twitter
So how do we compare e-mail vs. Twitter?
I could think of several criteria, which I think is most relevant to internet marketing and stacked against each other:
Twitter
E
Deliver
100%
95%
Format
SMS as a message + Link
HTML Plain
Size
140 characters
No Limit
Answer
~ 1-1. 5%
30% on average
Speed
Instant
Instant
Spam
None
Very
As shown by the comparison before e Twitter beats paper, however, there are certain things that are not mentioned in the comparison chart:
301 Moved
301 Moved
The document has moved
here.
301 Moved
301 Moved
The document has moved
here.
301 Moved
301 Moved
The document has moved
here.
301 Moved
301 Moved
The document has moved
here.
301 Moved
301 Moved
The document has moved
here.
Twitter is real time, have 100% and a monitor will never be blocked by spam filters. . . But this does not mean that email would become obsolete.
E-mail is still much more to communicate with customers on a personal level, to get through your posts and have subscribed to their newsletter.
